I think we all, at least once, wanted to be able to just drag a Fuselage Block with a Bomb Bay out of the Parts Window. It would have Settings like Speed, the Angle it opens and Size. It would also be the exact same as a normal Fuselage so you don’t have to make the whole Plane out of multiple Parts so it has no Edges sticking out. This would be very useful, because pretty much every Bomber has a Bomb Bay and it would make Life way easier. It would also make the Bomber way more Part Efficient if you want to add Missiles that extend with AG 1-8. You would only need to add a Piston to extend the Missile, so the Bomb Bay would have multiple Uses even for Fighters. The Part could simply be named Bay or something like that. But that’s just me.

If you’re on mobile, you probably know that one of the biggest issues when flying around your plane is the fact that the control pads are round. WHY ARE THEY ROUND? Having them round is dangerous, because it restricts how much you can move your stick in certain situations such as when you’re doing STOL landings and you need a lot of aleron to correct yourself, and you can’t because you can’t use all that aleron when your pitch is all the way back, so you have to pitch your nose down to move the alerons, and that’s really bad if you’re getting close to the ground.

CHANGE TNIS PLEASE!!!

Simple Planes is a great game, however it's accuracy in game physics and fluid dynamics isn't the best. Shippy456 states, "Due to my knowledge of very basic physics and fluid dynamics, I have become somewhat concerned about Simple Plane's physics and and it's drag model." WNP78 also describes, "Simple Plane's physics are definitely not as realistic as can be. They are pre-computed for each part at the start of the game and not updated if the craft's structure is changed. Parts which have no drag, when moved into airflow, will continue to have no drag. SimpleRockets2's drag model is more real-time, but at the end of the day, with all these things, it's about striking a reasonable balance between realism and not lagging out everyone's device." As you can see from these statements, I'm not the only one who is complaining about Simple Plane's current drag model. So, let's fix this! If you want an update on Simple Plane's physics, let's start voting! Thank you for your support!

Its just like this:

Squadron Member A.I
-They will protect you
-You can command them into formations
-You can command them to fire at will

Bomber A.I
-They will target the bridges or any destructible terrain (if you guys add more)
-Working tail gunner turret A.(pls add a variety of tail gunner parts in the gizmos section or something)

Torpedo Bomber A.I
-Same as bombers but they go for the ships
-Also make the ships flak fire at them

Escort A.I
-Add a selection menu of which plane they will escort
-They will shoot you if you get too close (like 1 mile)

Autopilot A.I
-Add a minimap that you can select waypoints that the autopilot follows.

Cruising A.I
-Planes that fly perfectly straight (pls make them adapt to the plane)

New Aggressive A.I
-A new one that targets other planes and you

Not related,but can you make things with car engines as ground targets, that will be great.
And also bigger caliber guns. Thats all.

i think the wing gun is a bit primitive, only it can shoot, with some features.
it would be great if you could adjust the values, such as the shooting speed (changing the sound), the color of the tracer (or bullet if you prefer), the damage, the impact force, everything without overload or XML, so that everyone could use it (including IOS).

list of suggested features (there are some existing ones):
Muzzle flash: (1,1,1), (true or false)
Muzzle velocity: (800 by default)
ImpactForce: (10 is default)
Ammo: (pls fix it the vanilla one is useless)
Reload Time: (in seconds)
Caliber: (in milimeters, metric is better)
Sound (cannon, MG ones... etc)
attaching to everything (fuselages, wings (all types), blocks, except to cockpits)
all of this in vanilla wing gun pls (maybe minigun)

A feature that would allow you to zoom in with the camera block using inputs. An example for an input could be "Activate1" or "Vtol" In xml you would be able to set the standard zoom "1" being 1x zoom/standard and 2 being 2x zoom. So if a camera had the max zoom of 2 you could use an input like Vtol to zoom in gradually up to 2x. An input like Activate1 would ofcourse just zoom it in automatially.

In summary, let cameras have a zoom in feature that has a max zoom in and the zoom would be controlled using an input.